Open menu

3.0 Hobbs Drain Catchment: Riparian Conditions

3.1 Hobbs Drain Instream Aquatic Habitat

3.1.1 Benthic Invertebrates

Freshwater benthic invertebrates are animals without backbones that live on the stream bottom and include crustaceans such as crayfish, molluscs and immature forms of aquatic insects. Benthos represent an extremely diverse group of aquatic animals and exhibit wide ranges of responses to stressors such as organic pollutants, sediments and toxicants, which allows scientists to use them as bioindicators.  As part of the Ontario Benthic Biomonitoring Network (OBBN), the RVCA has been collecting benthic invertebrates at the Bleeks Road site on Hobbs Drain since 2004. Monitoring data is analyzed for each sample site and the results are presented using the Family Biotic Index, Family Richness and percent Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera.

Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index

The Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index (FBI) is an indicator of organic and nutrient pollution and provides an estimate of water quality conditions for each site using established pollution tolerance values for benthic invertebrates. FBI results for the Hobbs Drain catchment sample location at Bleeks Road are separated by reporting period 2004 to 2009 and 2010 to 2015.  A wide ranging “Excellent” to “Poor” water quality conditions were observed at the Hobbs Drain sample location for the period from 2004 to 2015 (Figure 8) using a grading scheme developed by Conservation Authorities in Ontario for benthic invertebrates. 

Figure xx Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
Figure 8 Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
Family Richness

Family Richness measures the health of the community through its diversity and increases with increasing habitat diversity suitability and healthy water quality conditions. Family Richness is equivalent to the total number of benthic invertebrate families found within a sample.   The Hobbs Drain site is reported to have “Fair” to “Good” family richness (Figure 9).

Figure xx Family Richness at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
Figure 9 Family Richness at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
EPT

Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), Plecoptera (Stoneflies), and Trichoptera (Caddisflies) are species considered to be very sensitive to poor water quality conditions. High abundance of these organisms is generally an indication of good water quality conditions at a sample location.  During more recent sampling years the community structure has been shifting to species that are more sensitive to poor water quality conditions. As a result, the EPT indicates that the Hobbs Drain sample location is reported to have “Fair” to “Good” water quality (Figure 10) from 2004 to 2015.

Figure xx EPT at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
Figure 10 EPT at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road sample location
Site conditions at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road OBBN sample location at Bleeks Road
Site conditions at the Hobbs Drain Bleeks Road OBBN sample location at Bleeks Road
Conclusion

Overall the Hobbs Drain sample location aquatic habitat conditions from a benthic invertebrate perspective is considered “Good” from 2004 to 2015 as the samples are dominated by species that are moderately sensitive and sensitive to high organic pollution levels.

 

3.1.2 Thermal Regime

Many factors can influence fluctuations in stream temperature, including springs, tributaries, precipitation runoff, discharge pipes and stream shading from riparian vegetation. Water temperature is used along with the maximum air temperature (using the Stoneman and Jones method) to classify a watercourse as either warm water, cool water or cold water. Figure 11 shows where the thermal sampling sites were located along Hobbs Drain.  Analysis of the data collected indicates that Hobbs Drain is classified as a cool water system with cool to warm water reaches (Figure 12).  

Figure XX Temperature logger locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 11 Temperature logger locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 
Figure XX Temperature logger locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 12 Temperature logger data for two sites on Hobbs Drain.  
 

3.1.3 Fish Community

The Hobbs Drain catchment is classified as a mixed community of warm and cool water recreational and baitfish fishery with 23 species observed. Figure 13 shows the sampling locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment.

Figure XX Hobbs Drain catchment fish community
Figure 13 Hobbs Drain catchment fish community
Hobbs Drain fish sampling location
Hobbs Drain fish sampling location
 

The following table contains a list of species observed in the watershed.

Table 8 Fish species observed in Hobbs Drain catchment
Fish SpeciesFish codeFish SpeciesFish code
banded killifishBaKilfallfishFallf
blackchin shinerBcShifathead minnowFhMin
blacknose daceBnDacfinescale daceFsDac
blacknose shinerBnShihornyhead chubHhChu
bluntnose minnowBnMinlongnose daceLnDac
brassy minnowBrMinnorthern pearl dacePeDac
brook sticklebackBrStinorthern pikeNoPik
carps and minnowsCA_MInorthern redbelly daceNRDac
central mudminnowCeMudpumpkinseedPumpk
chrosomus sp.PhoSpspotfin shinerSpShi
common shinerCoShiwhite suckerWhSuc
creek chubCrChu
 

3.2 Headwater Drainage Features Assessment

3.2.1 Headwater Sampling Locations

The RVCA Stream Characterization program assessed Headwater Drainage Features for the Jock River subwatershed in 2015. This protocol measures zero, first and second order headwater drainage features (HDF).  It is a rapid assessment method characterizing the amount of water, sediment transport, and storage capacity within headwater drainage features (HDF). RVCA is working with other Conservation Authorities and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry to implement the protocol with the goal of providing standard datasets to support science development and monitoring of headwater drainage features.  An HDF is a depression in the land that conveys surface flow. Additionally, this module provides a means of characterizing the connectivity, form and unique features associated with each HDF (OSAP Protocol, 2013). In 2015 the program sampled 6 sites at road crossings in the Hobbs Drain catchment area (Figure 14). 

Figure XX Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 14 Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 

3.2.2 Headwater Feature Type

The headwater sampling protocol assesses the feature type in order to understand the function of each feature.  The evaluation includes the following classifications: defined natural channel, channelized or constrained, multi-thread, no defined feature, tiled, wetland, swale, roadside ditch and pond outlet.  By assessing the values associated with the headwater drainage features in the catchment area we can understand the ecosystem services that they provide to the watershed in the form of hydrology, sediment transport, and aquatic and terrestrial functions. Five features were classified as having been channelized and one feature was identified as natural. Figure 15 shows the feature type of the primary feature at the sampling locations.

Figure XX Headwater feature types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 15 Headwater feature types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 

3.2.3 Headwater Feature Flow

The observed flow condition within headwater drainage features can be highly variable depending on timing relative to the spring freshet, recent rainfall, soil moisture, etc.  Flow conditions are assessed in the spring and in the summer to determine if features are perennial and flow year round, if they are intermittent and dry up during the summer months or if they are ephemeral systems that do not flow regularly and generally respond to specific rainstorm events or snowmelt.  Flow conditions in headwater systems can change from year to year depending on local precipitation patterns. Figure 16 shows the observed flow conditions at the sampling locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment in 2015.

Figure XX Headwater feature flow conditions in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 16 Headwater feature flow conditions in the Hobbs Drain catchment
A summer photo of the headwater sample site in the Hobbs Drain catchment located on Fernbank Road
A summer photo of the headwater sample site in the Hobbs Drain catchment located on Fernbank Road

3.2.4 Feature Channel Modifications

Channel modifications were assessed at each headwater drainage feature sampling location.  Modifications include dredging, channel hardening and mixed modifications.  The Hobbs Drain catchment area had one site classified as having no channel modifications, two features were classified as being hardened, two had been dredged and one had mixed modifications. Figure 17 shows the channel modifications observed at the sampling locations for Hobbs Drain.

Figure XX Headwater feature channel modifications in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 17 Headwater feature channel modifications in the Hobbs Drain catchment

3.2.5 Headwater Feature Vegetation

Headwater feature vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found within the drainage feature.  The type of vegetated within the channel influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides.  For some types of headwater features the vegetation within the feature plays a very important role in flow and sediment movement and provides fish and wildlife habitat.  The following classifications are evaluated no vegetation, lawn, wetland, meadow, scrubland and forest.  The features assessed in the Hobbs Drain catchment were classified being dominated by wetland and meadow vegetation.  Figure 18 depicts the dominant vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Hobbs Drain catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature vegetation types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 18 Headwater feature vegetation types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 

3.2.6 Headwater Feature Riparian Vegetation

Headwater riparian vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found along the adjacent lands of a headwater drainage feature.  The type of vegetation within the riparian corridor influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides to the watershed.  Three sample locations in Hobbs Drain were dominated by natural vegetation in the form of scrubland, meadow and wetland vegetation. Three sample locations were dominated by other forms of vegetation of either crops or ornamental grasses. Figure 19 depicts the type of riparian vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Hobbs Drain catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 19  Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 

3.2.7 Headwater Feature Sediment Deposition

Assessing the amount of recent sediment deposited in a channel provides an index of the degree to which the feature could be transporting sediment to downstream reaches (OSAP, 2013).  Evidence of excessive sediment deposition might indicate the requirement to follow up with more detailed targeted assessments upstream of the site location to identify potential best management practices to be implemented.  Conditions ranged from no deposition observed to extensive deposition recorded. Figure 20 depicts the degree of sediment deposition observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Hobbs Drain catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 20 Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Hobbs Drain catchment
 

3.2.8 Headwater Feature Upstream Roughness

Feature roughness will provide a measure of the amount of materials within the bankfull channel that could slow down the velocity of water flowing within the headwater feature (OSAP, 2013).  Materials on the channel bottom that provide roughness include vegetation, woody debris and boulders/cobble substrates.  Roughness can provide benefits in mitigating downstream erosion on the headwater drainage feature and the receiving watercourse by reducing velocities.  Roughness also provides important habitat conditions for aquatic organisms. The sample locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment area ranged from minimal to high roughness conditions.  Figure 21 shows the feature roughness conditions at the sampling locations in the Hobbs Drain catchment.

Figure Headwater feature roughness in the Hobbs Drain catchment
Figure 21 Headwater feature roughness in the Hobbs Drain catchment