• Home
  • Subwatersheds
    • middle rideau subcatchment

    • Find your local waterbody
  • Archives
    • Rideau Lakes
      • Subwatershed Reports
      • Catchment Reports
    • Tay River
      • Subwatershed Reports
      • Catchment Reports

3. Riparian Conditions

Shoreline Buffer Land Cover Evaluation

The riparian or shoreline zone is that special area where the land meets the water. Well-vegetated shorelines are critically important in protecting water quality and creating healthy aquatic habitats, lakes and rivers. Natural shorelines intercept sediments and contaminants that could impact water quality conditions and harm fish habitat in streams. Well established buffers protect the banks against erosion, improve habitat for fish by shading and cooling the water and provide protection for birds and other wildlife that feed and rear young near water. A recommended target (from Environment Canada’s Guideline: How Much Habitat is Enough?) is to maintain a minimum 30 metre wide vegetated buffer along at least 75 percent of the length of both sides of rivers, creeks and streams.

Figure 16 shows the extent of the naturally vegetated riparian zone along a 30 metre wide strip of shoreline of Rosedale Creek and its tributaries. This information is derived from a dataset developed by the RVCA’s Land Cover Classification Program through heads-up digitization of 20cm DRAPE ortho-imagery at a 1:4000 scale, which details the catchment landscape using 10 land cover classes.

RiparianLCRosedale-Creek-001-001
Figure 16 Natural and other riparian land cover in the Rosedale Creek catchment

This analysis shows that the riparian buffer in the Rosedale Creek catchment is comprised of wetland (63 percent), crop and pastureland (20 percent), woodland (12 percent), settlement areas (three percent) and roads (two percent). Additional statistics for the Rosedale Creek catchment are presented in Table 10 and show that there has been very little change in shoreline cover from 2008 to 2014.

Table 10 Riparian land cover (2008 vs. 2014) in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Riparian Land Cover20082014Change - 2008 to 2014
AreaAreaArea
Ha.Percent Ha.PercentHa.Percent
Wetland327623306331
> Unevaluated(241)(46)(244)(47)(3)(1)
> Evaluated(86)(16)(86)(16)(0)(0)
Crop & Pasture102201022000
Woodland68136412-4-1
Settlement14315310
Transportation13213200

Rosedale Creek Overbank Zone

Riparian Buffer Width Evaluation

Figure 17 demonstrates the buffer conditions of the left and right banks separately.  Rosedale Creek had a buffer of greater than 30 meters along 84 percent of the right bank and 84 percent of the left bank.

Figure 16 Riparian Buffer Evaluation along Rosedale Creek
Figure 17 Riparian Buffer Evaluation along Rosedale Creek 

Adjacent Land Use

The RVCA’s Stream Characterization Program identifies nine different land uses beside Rosedale Creek (Figure 18). Surrounding land use is considered from the beginning to end of the survey section (100m) and up to 100m on each side of the creek. Land use outside of this area is not considered for the surveys but is nonetheless part of the subwatershed and will influence the creek. Natural areas made up 82 percent of the stream, characterized by wetlands, forest, scrubland and meadow. The remaining land use consisted of active agriculture, pasture, residential, commercial/industrial and infrastructure in the form of road crossings.

Figure 17 Land Use along Rosedale Creek
Figure 18 Land Use along Rosedale Creek

Rosedale Creek Shoreline Zone

Instream Erosion

Erosion is a normal, important stream process and may not affect actual bank stability; however, excessive erosion and deposition of sediment within a stream can have a detrimental effect on important fish and wildlife habitat.  Poor bank stability can greatly contribute to the amount of sediment carried in a waterbody as well as loss of bank vegetation due to bank failure, resulting in trees falling into the stream and the potential to impact instream migration.   Figure 19 shows variable erosion levels along Rosedale Creek with conditions ranging from no erosion to moderate levels of erosion.

Figure 18 Erosion along Rosedale Creek
Figure 19 Erosion along Rosedale Creek

Undercut Stream Banks

Undercut banks are a normal and natural part of stream function and can provide excellent refuge areas for fish. Figure 20 shows that Rosedale Creek had varying levels of undercut banks along the system.

Figure 19 Undercut stream banks along Rosedale Creek
Figure 20 Undercut stream banks along Rosedale Creek

Stream Shading

Grasses, shrubs and trees all contribute towards shading a stream. Shade is important in moderating stream temperature, contributing to food supply and helping with nutrient reduction within a stream. Figure 21 shows low to moderate levels of stream shading conditions along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 20 Stream shading along Rosedale Creek
Figure 21 Stream shading along Rosedale Creek

Instream Woody Debris

Figure 22 shows that the majority of Rosedale Creek had low to moderate levels of instream woody debris in the form of branches and trees. Instream woody debris is important for fish and benthic invertebrate habitat, by providing refuge and feeding areas.

Figure 21 Instream woody debris along Rosedale Creek
Figure 22 Instream woody debris along Rosedale Creek

Overhanging Trees and Branches

Figure 23 shows the system is dominated by low to moderate levels of overhanging branches and trees along Rosedale Creek. Overhanging branches and trees provide a food source, nutrients and shade which helps to moderate instream water temperatures.

Figure 22 Overhanging trees and branches along Rosedale Creek
Figure 23 Overhanging trees and branches along Rosedale Creek

Anthropogenic Alterations

Figure 24 shows 70 percent of Rosedale Creek remains “unaltered” with no anthropogenic alterations.   Twenty eight percent of Rosedale Creek was classified as natural with minor anthropogenic changes and two percent was considered altered in the form of road crossings and areas with a reduced natural buffer. 

Figure 23 Anthropogenic alterations along Rosedale Creek
Figure 24 Anthropogenic alterations along Rosedale Creek

Rosedale Creek Instream Aquatic Habitat

Benthic Invertebrates

Freshwater benthic invertebrates are animals without backbones that live on the stream bottom and include crustaceans such as crayfish, molluscs and immature forms of aquatic insects. Benthos represent an extremely diverse group of aquatic animals and exhibit wide ranges of responses to stressors such as organic pollutants, sediments and toxicants, which allows scientists to use them as bioindicators.  As part of the Ontario Benthic Biomonitoring Network (OBBN), the RVCA has been collecting benthic invertebrates at the Matheson Drive site on Rosedale Creek since 2003. Monitoring data is analyzed for each sample site and the results are presented using the Family Biotic Index, Family Richness and percent Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera.

Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index

The Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index (FBI) is an indicator of organic and nutrient pollution and provides an estimate of water quality conditions for each site using established pollution tolerance values for benthic invertebrates. FBI results for Rosedale Creek are separated by reporting period 2003 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014.  “Very Poor” to “Fair” water quality conditions being observed at the Rosedale Creek sample location for the period from 2003 to 2014 (Fig.25) using a grading scheme developed by Conservation Authorities in Ontario for benthic invertebrates.

Figure 24 Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index on Rosedale Creek
Figure 25 Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index on Rosedale Creek

Family Richness

Family Richness measures the health of the community through its diversity and increases with increasing habitat diversity suitability and healthy water quality conditions. Family Richness is equivalent to the total number of benthic invertebrate families found within a sample.   Rosedale Creek is reported to have “Poor” to “Good” family richness (Fig.26).

Figure 25 Family Richness in Rosedale Creek
Figure 26 Family Richness in Rosedale Creek

EPT

Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), Plecoptera (Stoneflies), and Trichoptera (Caddisflies) are species considered to be very sensitive to poor water quality conditions. High abundance of these organisms is generally an indication of good water quality conditions at a sample location.  During more recent sampling years the community structure has been shifting to species that are more sensitive to poor water quality conditions.  As a result, the EPT indicates that Rosedale Creek is reported to have “Poor” to “Good” water quality (Fig.27) from 2003 to 2014.

Figure 26 EPT in Rosedale Creek
Figure 27 EPT in Rosedale Creek

Conclusion

Overall Rosedale Creek aquatic habitat conditions from a benthic invertebrate perspective range from “Poor” to “Fair” from 2003 to 2014.

Habitat Complexity

Streams are naturally meandering systems and move over time; there are varying degrees of habitat complexity, depending on the creek. Examples of habitat complexity include variable habitat types such as pools and riffles as well as substrate variability and woody debris structure.  A high percentage of habitat complexity (heterogeneity) typically increases the biodiversity of aquatic organisms within a system. Thirty seven percent of Rosedale Creek was considered heterogeneous, as shown in Figure 28.

Figure 27 Habitat complexity along Rosedale Creek
Figure 28 Habitat complexity along Rosedale Creek

Instream Substrate

Diverse substrate is important for fish and benthic invertebrate habitat because some species have specific substrate requirements and for example will only reproduce on certain types of substrate.  Figure 29 shows that 27 percent of the substrate observed on Rosedale Creek was dominated by clay.  Overall substrate conditions were highly variable along Rosedale Creek.  Figure 30 shows the dominant substrate type observed for each section surveyed along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 28 Instream substrate along Rosedale Creek
Figure 29 Instream substrate along Rosedale Creek
Figure 29 shows the dominant substrate type along Rosedale Creek.
Figure 30 shows the dominant substrate type along Rosedale Creek.

Cobble and Boulder Habitat

Boulders create instream cover and back eddies for large fish to hide and/or rest out of the current.  Cobble provides important spawning habitat for certain fish species like walleye and various shiner species who are an important food source for larger fish.  Cobble can also provide habitat conditions for benthic invertebrates that are a key food source for many fish and wildlife species.  Figure 31 shows where cobble and boulder substrate are found in Rosedale Creek.

Figure 30 Instream substrate cobble and boulder along Rosedale Creek
Figure 31 Instream substrate cobble and boulder along Rosedale Creek

Instream Morphology

Pools and riffles are important habitat features for fish. Riffles are areas of agitated water and they contribute higher dissolved oxygen to the stream and act as spawning substrate for some species of fish, such as walleye. Pools provide shelter for fish and can be refuge pools in the summer if water levels drop and water temperature in the creek increases. Pools also provide important over wintering areas for fish. Runs are usually moderately shallow, with unagitated surfaces of water and areas where the thalweg (deepest part of the channel) is in the center of the channel. Figure 32 shows that Rosedale Creek is fairly uniform; 91 percent consists of runs, 9 percent riffles and 1 percent pools. Figure 33 shows where riffle habitat was observed along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 31 Instream morphology along Rosedale Creek
Figure 32 Instream morphology along Rosedale Creek
Figure 32 Riffle habitat locations along Rosedale Creek
Figure 33 Riffle habitat locations along Rosedale Creek

Vegetation Type

Instream vegetation provides a variety of functions and is a critical component of the aquatic ecosystem.  For example emergent plants along the shoreline can provide shoreline protection from wave action and important rearing habitat for species of waterfowl.  Submerged plants provide habitat for fish to find shelter from predator fish while they feed.  Floating plants such as water lilies shade the water and can keep temperatures cool while reducing algae growth.  The dominant vegetation type recorded at thirty two percent consisted of narrow leafed emergent in the form of grasses and sedges. Rosedale Creek had high levels of diversity for instream vegetation. Figure 34 depicts the plant community structure for Rosedale Creek. Figure 35 shows the dominant vegetation type observed for each section surveyed along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 33 Vegetation type along Rosedale Creek
Figure 34 Vegetation type along Rosedale Creek
Figure 34 Dominant vegetation type along Rosedale Creek
Figure 35 Dominant vegetation type along Rosedale Creek

Instream Vegetation Abundance

Instream vegetation is an important factor for a healthy stream ecosystem. Vegetation helps to remove contaminants from the water, contributes oxygen to the stream, and provides habitat for fish and wildlife. Too much vegetation can also be detrimental. Figure 36 demonstrates that Rosedale Creek had common and normal levels of instream vegetation for 55 percent of its length.  Low, rare and no vegetation were measured at 44 percent, while extensive levels were recorded at only two percent of stream surveys. 

Figure 35 Instream vegetation abundance along Rosedale Creek
Figure 36 Instream vegetation abundance along Rosedale Creek

Invasive Species

Invasive species can have major implications on streams and species diversity. Invasive species are one of the largest threats to ecosystems throughout Ontario and can out compete native species, having negative effects on local wildlife, fish and plant populations. One hundred percent of the sections surveyed along Rosedale Creek had invasive species (Figure 37). The invasive species observed in Rosedale Creek were European frogbit, purple loosestrife, glossy and common buckthorn, poison/wild parsnip, rusty crayfish, banded mystery snail, honey suckle, Eurasian milfoil and Manitoba maple. Figure 38 shows the frequency of the invasive species observed along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 36 Invasive species along Rosedale Creek
Figure 37 Invasive species along Rosedale Creek
Figure 37 Frequency of the invasive species observed along Rosedale Creek
Figure 38 Frequency of the invasive species observed along Rosedale Creek

Water Chemistry

During the stream characterization survey, a YSI probe is used to collect water chemistry information.  Dissolved oxygen, conductivity and pH are measured at the start and end of each section.

Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved oxygen is a measure of the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. The Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) suggest that for the protection of aquatic life the lowest acceptable dissolved oxygen concentration should be 6 mg/L for warmwater biota and 9.5 mg/L for coldwater biota (CCME, 1999).  Figure 39 shows that the dissolved oxygen in Rosedale Creek was within the threshold for warmwater biota in most reaches of the system, however areas near the Rideau River and the upper headwaters were below the warmwater threshold.  The average dissolved oxygen levels observed within the main stem of Rosedale Creek was 8. 08 mg/L which is within the recommended levels for warmwater biota.

Figure 38 Dissolved oxygen ranges in Rosedale Creek
Figure 39 Dissolved oxygen ranges in Rosedale Creek

Conductivity

Conductivity in streams is primarily influenced by the geology of the surrounding environment, but can vary drastically as a function of surface water runoff. Currently there are no CCME guideline standards for stream conductivity; however readings which are outside the normal range observed within the system are often an indication of unmitigated discharge and/or stormwater input. The average conductivity observed within the main stem of Rosedale Creek was 321.1 µs/cm. Figure 40 shows the conductivity readings for Rosedale Creek.

Figure 39 Specific conductivity ranges in Rosedale Creek
Figure 40 Specific conductivity ranges in Rosedale Creek

pH

Based on the PWQO for pH, a range of 6.5 to 8.5 should be maintained for the protection of aquatic life. Average pH values for Rosedale Creek averaged 7.94 thereby meeting the provincial standard (Figure 41).

Figure 40 pH ranges in Rosedale Creek
Figure 41 pH ranges in Rosedale Creek

Thermal Regime

Many factors can influence fluctuations in stream temperature, including springs, tributaries, precipitation runoff, discharge pipes and stream shading from riparian vegetation. Water temperature is used along with the maximum air temperature (using the Stoneman and Jones method) to classify a watercourse as either warm water, cool water or cold water. Figure 42 shows where the thermal sampling sites were located along Rosedale Creek.  Analysis of the data collected indicates that Rosedale Creek is classified as a cool water system with warm water reaches (Figure 43). 

Figure 41 Temperature logger locations on Rosedale Creek
Figure 42 Temperature logger locations on Rosedale Creek
Figure 38 Dissolved oxygen ranges in Rosedale Creek
SITE IDY_WATERX_AIRCLASSIFICATIONPROGRAMYEAR
RS1 - Rosedale Rd25.528.4WARMWATERMACRO2014
RS2 - Matheson Dr23.428.4COOL-WARMMACRO2014
RS3 - Code Rd22.227.6COOL-WARMMACRO2014
Figure 43 Temperature logger data for three sites on Rosedale Creek

Each point on the graph represents a temperature that meets the following criteria:

  • Sampling dates between July 1st and September 7th
  • Sampling date is preceded by two consecutive days above 24.5 °C, with no rain
  • Water temperatures are collected at 4pm
  • Air temperature is recorded as the max temperature for that day

Groundwater

Groundwater discharge areas can influence stream temperature, contribute nutrients, and provide important stream habitat for fish and other biota. During stream surveys, indicators of groundwater discharge are noted when observed. Indicators include: springs/seeps, watercress, iron staining, significant temperature change and rainbow mineral film.  Figure 44 shows areas where one or more of the above groundwater indicators were observed during stream surveys and headwater assessments.

Figure 43 Groundwater indicators observed in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 44 Groundwater indicators observed in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Headwaters Drainage Features Assessment 

The RVCA Stream Characterization program assessed Headwater Drainage Features for the Middle Rosedale subwatershed in 2014. This protocol measures zero, first and second order headwater drainage features (HDF).  It is a rapid assessment method characterizing the amount of water, sediment transport, and storage capacity within headwater drainage features (HDF). RVCA is working with other Conservation Authorities and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry to implement the protocol with the goal of providing standard datasets to support science development and monitoring of headwater drainage features.  An HDF is a depression in the land that conveys surface flow. Additionally, this module provides a means of characterizing the connectivity, form and unique features associated with each HDF (OSAP Protocol, 2013). In 2014 the program sampled 18 sites at road crossings in the Rosedale Creek catchment area (Figure 45).

Figure 44 Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 45 Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Spring photo of a headwater sample site in the Rosedale Creek catchment located on Matheson Drive
Spring photo of a headwater sample site in the Rosedale Creek catchment located on Matheson Drive

Feature Type

The headwater sampling protocol assesses the feature type in order to understand the function of each feature.  The evaluation includes the following classifications: defined natural channel, channelized or constrained, multi-thread, no defined feature, tiled, wetland, swale, roadside ditch and pond outlet.  By assessing the values associated with the headwater drainage features in the catchment area we can understand the ecosystem services that they provide to the watershed in the form of hydrology, sediment transport, and aquatic and terrestrial functions.  The Rosedale Creek catchment is dominated by wetland and natural headwater drainage features.  Two features were classified as having been channelized and one feature was identified as roadside drainage features.  Figure 46 shows the feature type of the primary feature at the sampling locations.

Figure 45 Headwater feature types in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 46 Headwater feature types in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Feature Channel Modifications

Channel modifications were assessed at each headwater drainage feature sampling location.  Modifications include channelization, dredging, hardening and realignments.  The majority of sampling locations for the Rosedale Creek catchment area were classified as having no channel modifications, five appeared to have been historically dredged and one was classified as having an online pond.  Figure 47 shows the channel modifications observed at the sampling locations for Rosedale Creek.

Figure 46 Headwater feature channel modifications in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 47 Headwater feature channel modifications in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Headwater Feature Vegetation

Headwater feature vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found within the drainage feature.  The type of vegetated within the channel influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides.  For some types of headwater features the vegetation within the feature plays a very important role in flow and sediment movement and provides wildlife habitat.  The following classifications are evaluated no vegetation, lawn, wetland, meadow, scrubland and forest.  The features assessed in the Rosedale Creek catchment were classified being dominated by wetland.  Two features were classified as meadow, one as lawn and six were classified as having no vegetation within the feature. Figure 48 depicts the dominant vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Rosedale Creek catchment.

Figure 47 Headwater feature vegetation types in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 48 Headwater feature vegetation types in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Headwater Feature Riparian Vegetation

Headwater riparian vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found along the adjacent lands of a headwater drainage feature.  The type of vegetation within the riparian corridor influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides to the watershed.  The sample locations in Rosedale Creek were dominated by natural vegetation in the form of meadow, scrubland, forest and wetland vegetation.  Figure 49. Depicts the type of riparian vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Rosedale Creek catchment.

Figure 48 Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 49 Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Headwater Feature Sediment Deposition

Assessing the amount of recent sediment deposited in a channel provides an index of the degree to which the feature could be transporting sediment to downstream reaches (OSAP, 2013).  Evidence of excessive sediment deposition might indicate the requirement to follow up with more detailed targeted assessments upstream of the site location to identify potential best management practices to be implemented.  Conditions ranged from no deposition observed to extensive deposition recorded. Figure 50 depicts the degree of sediment deposition observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Rosedale Creek catchment.

Figure 49 Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 50 Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Headwater Feature Upstream Roughness

Feature roughness will provide a measure of the amount of materials within the bankfull channel that could slow down the velocity of water flowing within the headwater feature (OSAP, 2013).  Materials on the channel bottom that provide roughness include vegetation, woody debris and boulders/cobble substrates.  Roughness can provide benefits in mitigating downstream erosion on the headwater drainage feature and the receiving watercourse by reducing velocities.  Roughness also provides important habitat conditions to aquatic organisms. The sample locations in the Rosedale Creek catchment area ranged from minimal to high roughness conditions.  Figure 51 shows the feature roughness conditions at the sampling locations in the Rosedale Creek catchment.

Figure 50 Headwater feature roughness in the Rosedale Creek catchment
Figure 51 Headwater feature roughness in the Rosedale Creek catchment

Fish Community

The Rosedale Creek catchment is classified as a mixed community of warm and cool water recreational and baitfish fishery with 25 species observed.  Table 11 lists those species observed in the catchment (Source: MNR/RVCA). Figure 52 shows the sampling locations along Rosedale Creek.

Figure 51 Rosedale Creek fish community
Figure 52 Rosedale Creek fish community
Table 11 Fish species observed in Rosedale Creek
Fish SpeciesFish codeFish SpeciesFish code
blacknose shinerBnShifinescale daceFsDac
bluegillBlueggolden shinerGoShi
bluntnose minnowBnMinlargemouth bassLmBas
brassy minnowBrMinlogperchLogpe
brook sticklebackBrStilongnose daceLnDac
brown bullheadBrBulmottled sculpinMoScu
carps and minnowsCA_MInorthern pearl dacePeDac
central mudminnowCeMudnorthern pikeNoPik
common shinerCoShinorthern redbelly daceNRDac
creek chubCrChupumpkinseedPumpk
etheostoma sp.EthSprock bassRoBas
fallfishFallfwhite suckerWhSuc
fathead minnowFhMin

 

Weighing and identifying fish on Rosedale Creek
Weighing and identifying fish on Rosedale Creek

Migratory Obstructions

It is important to know locations of migratory obstructions because these can prevent fish from accessing important spawning and rearing habitat. Migratory obstructions can be natural or manmade, and they can be permanent or seasonal. Figure 53 shows that Rosedale Creek had multiple beaver dams and one debris dam at the time of the survey in 2014. In addition one weir and one natural grade barrier was identified in the Rosedale Creek catchment.

Figure 52 Migratory obstructions along Rosedale Creek
Figure 53 Migratory obstructions along Rosedale Creek

Riparian Restoration

Figure 54 depicts the location of riparian restoration opportunities as a result of observations made during the stream survey and headwater drainage feature assessments.

Figure 53 Riparian restoration opportunities along Rosedale Creek
Figure 54 Riparian restoration opportunities along Rosedale Creek