• Home
  • Subwatersheds
    • middle rideau subcatchment

    • Find your local waterbody
  • Archives
    • Rideau Lakes
      • Subwatershed Reports
      • Catchment Reports
    • Tay River
      • Subwatershed Reports
      • Catchment Reports

3.0 Jock River-Richmond Catchment: Riparian Conditions

The stream characterization program surveyed the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment area.  Marlborough Creek is a tributary of the Jock River that enters the Jock River from the south immediately downstream of Eagleson Road.  Results for both systems have been summarized separately for each indicator.

3.1 Jock River Overbank Zone

3.1.1 Riparian Buffer Width Evaluation

Figures 11 and 12 demonstrate the buffer conditions along the left and right banks of the Jock River and Marlborough Creek. The Jock River in the Richmond catchment had a buffer of greater than 30 meters along 88 percent of the right bank and 87 percent of the left bank. A five meter or less buffer was present along only three percent of its right and left banks. Marlborough Creek had a buffer of greater than 30 meters along 99 percent of both the right and left banks. A five meter or less buffer was present along one percent of its right and left banks.

Figure XX Riparian Buffer Evaluation along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 11 Riparian Buffer Evaluation along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment 
Figure XX Riparian Buffer Evaluation along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 12 Riparian Buffer Evaluation along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment  
 

3.1.2 Riparian Buffer Alterations

Alterations within the riparian buffer were assessed within three distinct shoreline zones (0-5m, 5-15m, 15-30m), and evaluated based on the dominant vegetative community and/or land cover type (Figure 13). The riparian buffer zone along the Jock River within the Richmond catchment was found to have variable conditions along the corridor. These alterations were generally associated with reduced shoreline buffers and residential/agricultural land use. Marlborough Creek is fairly uniform with conditions being predominantly natural.

Figure XX Riparian buffer alterations along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 13 Riparian buffer alterations along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.1.3 Adjacent Land Use

The RVCA’s Stream Characterization Program identifies eight different land uses beside the Jock River in the Richmond catchment (Figure 14). Surrounding land use is considered from the beginning to end of the survey section (100m) and up to 100m on each side of the river. Land use outside of this area is not considered for the surveys but is nonetheless part of the subwatershed and will influence the creek. Natural areas made up 74 percent of the stream, characterized by forest, scrubland, meadow and wetland. Forest habitat was dominant in the adjacent lands along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment at 51 percent. The remaining land use consisted of active agriculture, abandoned agriculture, residential and recreational.

Figure XX Land Use along Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 14 Land Use along Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Natural areas made up 93 percent of Marlborough Creek characterized by forest, scrubland, meadow and wetland. Wetland habitat was dominant in the adjacent lands along Marlborough Creek at 44 percent.  The remaining land use consisted of active agriculture, residential, infrastructure and industrial/commercial (Figure 15).

Figure XX Land Use along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 15 Land Use along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2 Jock River Shoreline Zone

3.2.1 Instream Erosion

Stream erosion is the process by which water erodes and transports sediments, resulting in dynamic flows and diverse habitat conditions.  Excessive erosion can result in drastic environmental changes, as habitat conditions, water quality and aquatic life are all negatively affected.  Bank stability was assessed as the overall extent of each section with “unstable” shoreline conditions.  These conditions are defined by the presence of significant exposed soils/roots, minimal bank vegetation, severe undercutting, slumping or scour and potential failed erosion measures.  Figure 16 shows low levels of erosion along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Erosion along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 16 Erosion along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2.2 Undercut Stream Banks

Stream bank undercuts can provide excellent cover habitat for aquatic life, however excessive levels can be an indication of unstable shoreline conditions.  Bank undercut was assessed as the overall extent of each surveyed section with overhanging bank cover present. Figure 17 shows that Jock River in the Richmond catchment had low to high levels of undercut banks along the system.  Marlborough Creek had no undercut banks along most of the system with the exception of a few sections in the upper reach with low to moderate levels of undercut banks.

Figure XX Undercut stream banks along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 17 Undercut stream banks along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2.3 Stream Shading

Grasses, shrubs and trees all contribute towards shading a stream. Shade is important in moderating stream temperature, contributing to food supply and helping with nutrient reduction within a stream.  Stream cover is assessed as the total coverage area in each section that is shaded by overhanging trees/grasses and tree canopy, at greater than 1m above the water surface.  Figure 18 shows low to moderate levels of stream shading dominate conditions in most reaches of the Jock River in the Richmond catchment.  Marlborough Creek had high levels of stream shading along much of the system.

Figure XX Stream shading along Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 18 Stream shading along Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2.4 Instream Woody Debris

Figure 19 shows that the majority of the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment had low levels of instream woody debris in the form of branches and trees. Instream woody debris is important for fish and benthic invertebrate habitat, by providing refuge and feeding areas.

Figure XX Instream woody debris along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 19 Instream woody debris along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2.5 Overhanging Trees and Branches

Trees and branches that are less than one meter from the surface of the water are defined as overhanging.  Overhanging branches and trees provide a food source, nutrients and shade which helps to moderate instream water temperatures.  Figure 20 shows that both systems are highly variable with low to high levels of overhanging branches and trees in the Richmond catchment. 

Figure XX Overhanging trees and branches along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 20 Overhanging trees and branches along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.2.6 Anthropogenic Alterations

Stream alterations are classified based on specific functional criteria associated with the flow conditions, the riparian buffer and potential human influences.  Figure 21 shows 62 percent of the Jock River in the Richmond catchment remains “unaltered” with no anthropogenic alterations.   Thirty seven percent of Jock River in the Richmond catchment was classified as natural with minor anthropogenic changes and two percent was considered altered.  The alterations along the Jock River in this reach were in the form of reduced buffers, shoreline modifications and road crossings. 

Figure XX Anthropogenic alterations along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 21 Anthropogenic alterations along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Figure 22 shows 80 percent of Marlborough Creek remains “unaltered” with no anthropogenic alterations. Twenty percent of Marlborough Creek was classified as natural with minor anthropogenic changes. There were minimal anthropogenic alterations observed along the system.

Figure XX Anthropogenic alterations along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 22 Anthropogenic alterations along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.3 Jock River/Marlborough Creek Instream Aquatic Habitat

3.3.1 Benthic Invertebrates

Freshwater benthic invertebrates are animals without backbones that live on the stream bottom and include crustaceans such as crayfish, molluscs and immature forms of aquatic insects. Benthos represent an extremely diverse group of aquatic animals and exhibit wide ranges of responses to stressors such as organic pollutants, sediments and toxicants, which allows scientists to use them as bioindicators.  As part of the Ontario Benthic Biomonitoring Network (OBBN), the RVCA has been collecting benthic invertebrates at the Ottawa River site on the Jock River since 2004. Monitoring data is analyzed for each sample site and the results are presented using the Family Biotic Index, Family Richness and percent Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera.

Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index

The Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index (FBI) is an indicator of organic and nutrient pollution and provides an estimate of water quality conditions for each site using established pollution tolerance values for benthic invertebrates. FBI results for the Jock River Richmond catchment sample location at Ottawa street are separated by reporting period 2004 to 2009 and 2010 to 2015.  “Fair” to “Poor” water quality conditions being observed at the Jock River Richmond sample location for the period from 2004 to 2015 (Figure 23) using a grading scheme developed by Conservation Authorities in Ontario for benthic invertebrates. 

Figure xx Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
Figure 23 Hilsenhoff Family Biotic Index at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
Family Richness

Family Richness measures the health of the community through its diversity and increases with increasing habitat diversity suitability and healthy water quality conditions. Family Richness is equivalent to the total number of benthic invertebrate families found within a sample. The Jock River Richmond site is reported to have “Fair” family richness (Figure 24).

Figure xx Family Richness at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
Figure 24 Family Richness at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
EPT

Ephemeroptera (Mayflies), Plecoptera (Stoneflies), and Trichoptera (Caddisflies) are species considered to be very sensitive to poor water quality conditions. High abundance of these organisms is generally an indication of good water quality conditions at a sample location. The EPT indicates that the Jock River Richmond sample location is reported to have “Fairly poor” water quality (Figure 25) from 2004 to 2015.

Figure xx EPT at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
Figure 25 EPT at the Jock River Ottawa Street sample location
Conclusion

Overall the Jock River Richmond catchment sample location aquatic habitat conditions from a benthic invertebrate perspective is considered “Fairly Poor” from 2004 to 2015 as the samples are dominated by species that are moderately sensitive and sensitive to high organic pollution levels.

 

3.3.2 Habitat Complexity

Habitat complexity is a measure of the overall diversity of habitat types and features within a stream. Streams with high habitat complexity support a greater variety of species niches, and therefore contribute to greater diversity. Factors such as substrate, flow conditions (pools, riffles) and cover material (vegetation, wood structure, etc.) all provide crucial habitat to aquatic life.  Habitat complexity is assessed based on the presence of boulder, cobble and gravel substrates, as well as the presence of instream woody material.

Diverse habitat cover was identified throughout the Jock River Richmond reach and Marlborough Creek, with considerable coverage across the surveyed stream (Figure 26). Many of these sections represent potentially crucial habitat for resident species. Regions with reduced habitat complexity were observed in the lower reaches for both systems within the catchment.

Figure XX Habitat complexity along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 26 Habitat complexity along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.3 Instream Substrate

Diverse substrate is important for fish and benthic invertebrate habitat because some species have specific substrate requirements and for example will only reproduce on certain types of substrate.  The absence of diverse substrate types may limit the overall diversity of species within a stream. Figure 27 shows that cobble was present within 75% of the sections, gravel was present at 73% and boulders were present in 69% of surveyed sections.  Overall substrate conditions were diverse along the Jock River Richmond reach.

Figure XX Instream substrate along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 27 Instream substrate along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Figure 28 shows the types of substrate present along Marlborough Creek.  Silt was observed within 98% of the sections, clay was present at 80% and boulders were present in 63% of surveyed sections.  Cobble was present at 58% of the sections, while gravel was observed at 25% of the sections.  Overall there was less diversity in Marlborough Creek than in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Instream substrate along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 28 Instream substrate along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

Figure 29 shows the dominant substrate type observed for each section surveyed along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment.

Figure XX shows the dominant substrate type along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment.
Figure 29 Dominant substrate type along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.4 Instream Morphology

Pools and riffles are important habitat features for aquatic life.  Riffles are fast flowing areas characterized by agitation and overturn of the water surface. Riffles thereby play a crucial role in contributing to dissolved oxygen conditions and directly support spawning for some fish species.  They are also areas that support high benthic invertebrate populations which are an important food source for many aquatic species.  Pools are characterized by minimal flows, with relatively deep water and winter and summer refuge habitat for aquatic species.  Runs are moderately shallow, with unagitated surfaces of water and areas where the thalweg (deepest part of the channel) is in the center of the channel. Figure 30 shows that the Jock River is fairly diverse; 76 percent consists of runs, 20 percent riffles and four percent pools.

Figure XX Instream morphology along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 30 Instream morphology along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Figure 31 shows that Marlborough Creek is fairly diverse; 50 percent consists of pools, 45 percent runs and five percent riffles.

Figure XX Instream morphology along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 31 Instream morphology along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

Figure 32 shows where the riffle habitat areas were observed along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Riffle habitat locations along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 32 Riffle habitat locations along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.3.5 Vegetation Type

Instream vegetation provides a variety of functions and is a critical component of the aquatic ecosystem.  Aquatic plants promote stream health by:

  • Providing direct riparian/instream habitat
  • Stabilizing flows reducing shoreline erosion
  • Contributing to dissolved oxygen through photosynthesis
  • Maintaining temperature conditions through shading

For example emergent plants along the shoreline can provide shoreline protection from wave action and important rearing habitat for species of waterfowl.  Submerged plants provide habitat for fish to find shelter from predator fish while they feed.  Floating plants such as water lilies shade the water and can keep temperatures cool while reducing algae growth.  Narrow leaved emergents were present at 88% of the sections surveyed, algae was observed in 90% of sections, while free floating plants were observed in 62% of surveyed sections. Broad leaved emergents were observed in 77% of sections, submerged plants in 83%, floating plants in 63% and robust emergents in 19% of sections surveyed. Figure 33 depicts the plant community structure for the Jock River Richmond catchment.

Figure xx Vegetation type along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 33 Vegetation type along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Algae was observed in 100% of sections, narrow leaved emergents were present at 93% of the sections surveyed,  while free floating plants were observed in 60% of the Marlborough Creek surveyed sections. Broad leaved emergents were observed in 68% of sections, submerged plants in 78%, floating plants in 80% and robust emergents in 50% of sections surveyed. Figure 35 depicts the plant community structure for Marlborough Creek.

Figure xx Vegetation type along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 34 Vegetation type along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 35 Dominant vegetation type along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 35 Dominant vegetation type along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.6 Instream Vegetation Abundance

Instream vegetation is an important factor for a healthy stream ecosystem. Vegetation helps to remove contaminants from the water, contributes oxygen to the stream, and provides habitat for fish and wildlife. Too much vegetation can also be detrimental. Figure 36 demonstrates that the Jock River Richmond reach had normal to common levels of vegetation recorded at 55 percent of stream surveys.  Low to rare levels of vegetation were observed at 40% of the stream sections.

Figure xx Instream vegetation abundance along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 36 Instream vegetation abundance along the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Figure 37 demonstrates that Marlborough Creek had normal to common levels of vegetation recorded at 32 percent of stream surveys.  Extensive levels of vegetation was observed at 62% of the stream sections and was consistent with areas dominated by the invasive aquatic plant European frogbit.

Figure xx Instream vegetation abundance along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 37 Instream vegetation abundance along Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.7 Invasive Species

Invasive species can have major implications on streams and species diversity. Invasive species are one of the largest threats to ecosystems throughout Ontario and can out compete native species, having negative effects on local wildlife, fish and plant populations. Sixty nine percent of the sections surveyed along the Jock River Richmond reach had invasive species, while 100 percent of Marlborough Creek had invasive species (Figure 38). The invasive species observed in the Jock River were European frogbit, purple loosestrife, poison/wild parsnip, banded mystery snail, Himalayan balsam, yellow iris, Phragmites and Manitoba maple.  The invasive species observed in Marlborough Creek were European frogbit, European/Black alder, purple loosestrife, poison/wild parsnip, common/glossy buckthorn, banded mystery snail, garlic mustard and Manitoba maple.  Invasive species abundance (i.e. the number of observed invasive species per section) was assessed to determine the potential range/vector of many of these species (Figure 38). 

Figure XX Invasive species abundance along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 38 Invasive species abundance along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.8 Water Chemistry

During the stream characterization survey, a YSI probe is used to collect water chemistry information.  Dissolved oxygen (DO), specific conductivity (SPC) and pH are measured at the start and end of each section. 

3.3.8.1 Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved oxygen is a measure of the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. The Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) suggest that for the protection of aquatic life the lowest acceptable dissolved oxygen concentration should be 6 mg/L for warmwater biota and 9.5 mg/L for coldwater biota (CCME, 1999).  Figure 39 shows that the dissolved oxygen in the Jock River Richmond catchment was below the threshold for warmwater biota in the upper sections of this reach of the system.  The average dissolved oxygen levels observed in the Jock River was 7.91 mg/L which is within the recommended levels for warm and cool water biota (Figure 39). 

Figure XX Dissolved oxygen ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 39 Dissolved oxygen ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

The average dissolved oxygen levels observed within Marlborough Creek was 7.68 mg/L which is within the recommended levels for warm and cool water biota (Figure 40).

Figure XX Dissolved oxygen ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 40 Dissolved oxygen ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
3.3.8.2 Conductivity

Conductivity in streams is primarily influenced by the geology of the surrounding environment, but can vary drastically as a function of surface water runoff. Currently there are no CCME guideline standards for stream conductivity; however readings which are outside the normal range observed within the system are often an indication of unmitigated discharge and/or stormwater input. The average conductivity observed within the main stem of Jock River in the Richmond catchment was 480.15 µs/cm (Figure 41).  

Figure XX Specific conductivity ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 41 Specific conductivity ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Average conductivity observed within Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment was 964.41 µs/cm (Figure 42).  These levels would be considered higher than most systems in the Jock River watershed.  

Figure XX Specific conductivity ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 42 Specific conductivity ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
3.3.8.3 pH

Based on the PWQO for pH, a range of 6.5 to 8.5 should be maintained for the protection of aquatic life. Average pH values for the Jock River in the Richmond catchment averaged 7.97 (Figure 43).

Figure XX pH ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 43 pH ranges in the Jock River in the Richmond catchment

Average pH values averaged 7.91 for Marlborough Creek thereby meeting the provincial standard (Figure 44).

Figure XX pH ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 44 pH ranges in Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 
3.3.8.4 Oxygen Saturation

Oxygen saturation is measured as the ratio of dissolved oxygen relative to the maximum amount of oxygen that will dissolve based on the temperature and atmospheric pressure. Well oxygenated water will stabilize at or above 100% saturation, however the presence of decaying matter/pollutants can drastically reduce these levels. Oxygen input through photosynthesis has the potential to increase saturation above 100% to a maximum of 500%, depending on the productivity level of the environment. In order to represent the relationship between concentration and saturation, the measured values have been summarized into 6 classes:

  1. <100% Saturation / <6.0 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration and saturation are not sufficient to support aquatic life and may represent impairment
  2. >100% Saturation / <6.0 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration is not sufficient to support aquatic life, however saturation levels indicate that the water has stabilized at its estimated maximum. This is indicative of higher water temperatures and stagnant flows.
  3. <100% Saturation / 6.0-9.5 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration is sufficient to support warm water biota, however depletion factors are likely present and are limiting maximum saturation.
  4. >100% Saturation / 6.0-9.5 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration and saturation levels are optimal for warm water biota.
  5. <100% Saturation / >9.5 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration is sufficient to support cold water biota, however depletion factors are likely present and are limiting maximum saturation.
  6. 6) >100% Saturation / >9.5 mg/L Concentration. Oxygen concentration and saturation levels are optimal for coldwater biota.
Figure XX A bivariate assessment of dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L) and saturation (%) on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 45 A bivariate assessment of dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L) and saturation (%) on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

Dissolved oxygen conditions on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment are highly variable with areas that are sufficient to support a mixed community; while certain sections had levels that were insufficient to support warm and coldwater biota (Figure 45).

3.3.8.5 Specific Conductivity

Specific conductivity (SPC) is a standardized measure of electrical conductance, collected at or corrected to a water temperature of 25⁰C. SPC is directly related to the concentration of ions in water, and is commonly influenced by the presence of dissolved salts, alkalis, chlorides, sulfides and carbonate compounds. The higher the concentration of these compounds, the higher the conductivity. Common sources of elevated conductivity include storm water, agricultural inputs and commercial/industrial effluents.

In order to summarize the conditions observed, SPC levels were evaluated as either normal, moderately elevated or highly elevated. These categories correspond directly to the degree of variation (i.e. standard deviation) at each site relative to the average across the system.

Normal levels were maintained along the lower sections of the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment, with moderately elevated levels observed in the upper reaches of both systems (Figure 46). 

Figure XX Relative specific conductivity levels on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 46 Relative specific conductivity levels on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment

3.3.9 Thermal Regime

Many factors can influence fluctuations in stream temperature, including springs, tributaries, precipitation runoff, discharge pipes and stream shading from riparian vegetation. Water temperature is used along with the maximum air temperature (using the Stoneman and Jones method) to classify a watercourse as either warm water, cool water or cold water. Figure 47 shows where the thermal sampling sites were located along Jock River and Marlborough Creek.  Analysis of the data collected indicates that Jock River in the Richmond catchment is classified as a warm water system with cool to warm water reaches (Figure 48).  Marlborough Creek is classified as a warm water system with cool to warm water reaches (Figure 49).

Figure XX Temperature logger locations on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 47 Temperature logger locations on the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure XX Temperature logger data for three sites on Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 48 Temperature logger data for three sites on Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure XX Temperature logger data for the site on Marlborough Creek
Figure 49 Temperature logger data for the site on Marlborough Creek  
 

Each point on the graph represents a temperature that meets the following criteria:

  • Sampling dates between July 1st and September 7th
  • Sampling date is preceded by two consecutive days above 24.5 °C, with no rain
  • Water temperatures are collected at 4pm
  • Air temperature is recorded as the max temperature for that day

3.3.10 Groundwater

Groundwater discharge areas can influence stream temperature, contribute nutrients, and provide important stream habitat for fish and other biota. During stream surveys, indicators of groundwater discharge are noted when observed. Indicators include: springs/seeps, watercress, iron staining, significant temperature change and rainbow mineral film.  Figure 50 shows areas where one or more of the above groundwater indicators were observed during stream surveys and headwater assessments. 

Figure XX Groundwater indicators observed in the Richmond catchment
Figure 50 Groundwater indicators observed in the Richmond catchment
 

3.3.11 Fish Community

The Jock River Richmond catchment is classified as a mixed community of warm and cool water recreational and baitfish fishery with 39 species observed.  Figure 51 shows the sampling locations along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment. 

Figure XX Jock River and Marlborough Creek fish community in the Richmond catchment
Figure 51 Jock River and Marlborough Creek fish community in the Richmond catchment
 

The following table contains a list of species observed in the watershed.

Table 7 Fish species observed in Jock River Richmond catchment
Fish SpeciesFish codeFish SpeciesFish code
banded killifishBaKilhornyhead chubHhChu
blackchin shinerBcShilogperchLogpe
blacknose daceBnDaclongnose daceLnDac
blacknose shinerBnShiminnow hybridsHy600
bluegillBluegmottled sculpinMoScu
bluntnose minnowBnMinmuskellungeMuske
brassy minnowBrMinnorthern pearl dacePeDac
brook silversideBrSilnorthern pikeNoPik
brook sticklebackBrStinorthern redbelly daceNRDac
brown bullheadBrBulpumpkinseedPumpk
central mudminnowCeMudrock bassRoBas
central stonerollerCeStoshorthead redhorseShRed
common carpCoCarsmallmouth bassSmBas
common shinerCoShispotfin shinerSpShi
creek chubCrChuSpottail shinerSfShi
etheostoma sp.EthspstonecatStone
fallfishFallfwalleyeWalle
fathead minnowFhMinwhite suckerWhSuc
finescale daceFsDacyellow bullheadYeBul
golden shinerGoShi
Walleye and smallmouth bass captured at the embayment at the Richmond Conservation Area
Walleye and smallmouth bass captured at the embayment at the Richmond Conservation Area
Walleye and smallmouth bass captured at the Jock River embayment at the Richmond Conservation Area
Northern pike captured in the Jock River embayment at the Richmond Conservation Area
Northern pike captured in the Jock River embayment at the Richmond Conservation Area
 

3.3.12 Migratory Obstructions

It is important to know locations of migratory obstructions because these can prevent fish from accessing important spawning and rearing habitat. Migratory obstructions can be natural or manmade, and they can be permanent or seasonal. Figure 52 shows that Jock River in the Richmond catchment had one weir which is a seasonal barrier known as the Richmond weir at the time of the survey in 2015.  One debris dam was observed on Marlborough Creek at the timeof the survey in 2015.

Figure XX Migratory obstructions along Jock River in the Richmond catchment
Figure 52 Migratory obstructions along Jock River in the Richmond catchment
 

3.3.13 Riparian Restoration

Figure 53 depicts the locations of various riparian restoration opportunities as a result of observations made during the stream survey and headwater drainage feature assessments.   

Figure XX Riparian restoration opportunities along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 53 Riparian restoration opportunities along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.3.14 Instream Restoration

Figure 54 depicts the locations of various instream restoration opportunities as a result of observations made during the stream survey and headwater drainage feature assessments.   

Figure XX Instream restoration opportunities along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
Figure 54 Instream restoration opportunities along the Jock River and Marlborough Creek in the Richmond catchment
 

3.4 Headwater Drainage Feature Assessment

3.4.1 Headwater Sampling

The RVCA Stream Characterization program assessed Headwater Drainage Features for the Jock River subwatershed in 2015. This protocol measures zero, first and second order headwater drainage features (HDF).  It is a rapid assessment method characterizing the amount of water, sediment transport, and storage capacity within headwater drainage features (HDF). RVCA is working with other Conservation Authorities and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry to implement the protocol with the goal of providing standard datasets to support science development and monitoring of headwater drainage features.  An HDF is a depression in the land that conveys surface flow. Additionally, this module provides a means of characterizing the connectivity, form and unique features associated with each HDF (OSAP Protocol, 2013). In 2015 the program sampled 9 sites at road crossings in the Jock River Richmond catchment area (Figure 55).  

Figure XX Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 55 Locations of the headwater sampling sites in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.2 Headwater Feature Type

The headwater sampling protocol assesses the feature type in order to understand the function of each feature.  The evaluation includes the following classifications: defined natural channel, channelized or constrained, multi-thread, no defined feature, tiled, wetland, swale, roadside ditch and pond outlet.  By assessing the values associated with the headwater drainage features in the catchment area we can understand the ecosystem services that they provide to the watershed in the form of hydrology, sediment transport, and aquatic and terrestrial functions.  Three features were classified as having been tiled, two were channelized, one feature was identified as a roadside drainage features, one was classified as a wetland and two feature were classified as natural.  Figure 56 shows the feature type of the primary feature at the sampling locations.

Figure XX Headwater feature types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 56 Headwater feature types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.3 Headwater Feature Flow

The observed flow condition within headwater drainage features can be highly variable depending on timing relative to the spring freshet, recent rainfall, soil moisture, etc.  Flow conditions are assessed in the spring and in the summer to determine if features are perennial and flow year round, if they are intermittent and dry up during the summer months or if they are ephemeral systems that do not flow regularly and generally respond to specific rainstorm events or snowmelt.  Flow conditions in headwater systems can change from year to year depending on local precipitation patterns.  Figure 57 shows the observed flow conditions at the sampling locations in the Jock River Richmond catchment in 2015.

Figure XX Headwater feature flow conditions in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 57 Headwater feature flow conditions in the Jock River Richmond catchment
A spring photo of the headwater sample site in the Jock River Richmond catchment located on Joy’s Road
A spring photo of the headwater sample site in the Jock River Richmond catchment located on Joy’s Road
A summer photo of the headwater sample site in the Jock River Richmond catchment located on Joy’s Road
A summer photo of the headwater sample site in the Jock River Richmond catchment located on Joy’s Road
 

3.4.4 Headwater Feature Channel Modifications

Channel modifications were assessed at each headwater drainage feature sampling location.  Modifications include channelization, dredging, hardening and realignments.  The Jock River Richmond catchment area had three sites classified as having no channel modifications, four features were classified as being dredged and two had mixed modifications.  Figure 58 shows the channel modifications observed at the sampling locations for Jock River Richmond.

Figure XX Headwater feature channel modifications in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 58 Headwater feature channel modifications in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.5 Headwater Feature Vegetation

Headwater feature vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found within the drainage feature.  The type of vegetated within the channel influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides.  For some types of headwater features the vegetation within the feature plays a very important role in flow and sediment movement and provides wildlife habitat.  The following classifications are evaluated no vegetation, lawn, wetland, meadow, scrubland and forest.  Figure 59 depicts the dominant vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Jock River Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature vegetation types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 59 Headwater feature vegetation types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.6 Headwater Feature Riparian Vegetation

Headwater riparian vegetation evaluates the type of vegetation that is found along the adjacent lands of a headwater drainage feature.  The type of vegetation within the riparian corridor influences the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem values that the feature provides to the watershed.  Figure 60 depicts the type of riparian vegetation observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Jock River Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 60 Headwater feature riparian vegetation types in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.7 Headwater Feature Sediment Deposition

Assessing the amount of recent sediment deposited in a channel provides an index of the degree to which the feature could be transporting sediment to downstream reaches (OSAP, 2013).  Evidence of excessive sediment deposition might indicate the requirement to follow up with more detailed targeted assessments upstream of the site location to identify potential best management practices to be implemented.  Conditions ranged from minimal to extensive deposition recorded.  Figure 61 depicts the degree of sediment deposition observed at the sampled headwater sites in the Jock River Richmond catchment.

Figure XX Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Jock River Richmond catchment
Figure 61 Headwater feature sediment deposition in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 

3.4.8 Headwater Feature Upstream Roughness

Feature roughness will provide a measure of the amount of materials within the bankfull channel that could slow down the velocity of water flowing within the headwater feature (OSAP, 2013).  Materials on the channel bottom that provide roughness include vegetation, woody debris and boulders/cobble substrates.  Roughness can provide benefits in mitigating downstream erosion on the headwater drainage feature and the receiving watercourse by reducing velocities.  Roughness also provides important habitat conditions to aquatic organisms. The sample locations in the Jock River Richmond catchment area ranged from minimal to extreme roughness conditions.  Figure 62 shows the feature roughness conditions at the sampling locations in the Jock River Richmond catchment.

Figure Headwater feature roughness in the Jock River Richmond catchment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 62 Headwater feature roughness in the Jock River Richmond catchment